“No one really knows how these tools work, companies hide it. “Judges and prosecutors automatically order phone forensics, and one of the consequences is an unnecessary invasion of privacy,” says lawyer Vladimir Marinkov.įor the lawyers BIRN spoke to, the problem is that these commercial digital forensic tools hide the way they break through the phone’s security mechanisms and extract data. “When you have 2,000 cases where expert evidence is being unnecessarily conducted, it gets serious. Telephone forensics requires a prior order from a court or prosecutor, but is often unnecessary and even more often overly broad, and the handling of the phone and the data on it during and after forensics is completely unregulated, experts say. “Such a system should not be used because it always picks up more than the court order,” says Eitai Mak, an Israeli human rights lawyer.īIRN’s research has shown that the equipment can extract all data from a mobile phone and then analyses it, including data from innocent people. “With these devices, the entire content of the mobile phone is one click away from the police. Today, the Ministry of Interior’s National Centre for Criminal Forensics has tools from Cellebrite of Israel, Oxygen of the UK, MSAB of Sweden, Magnet of Canada and, most recently, Elcomsoft of Russia. Long-deleted Tinder, forgotten messages, booked hotels, purchased tickets, history of keyboard entries, locations, Wi-Fi networks used – all this can be found by the Serbian Interior Ministry if it gets into someone’s phone.įor years, the Ministry of the Interior has been purchasing highly intrusive digital phone forensics equipment, according to procurement data from the Serbian Ministry of the Interior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |